June 1, 2014 Thesis Open Access

Engidawork Kibneh

DCAT Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:adms="http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dctype="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/" xmlns:dcat="http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#" xmlns:duv="http://www.w3.org/ns/duv#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:frapo="http://purl.org/cerif/frapo/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:gsp="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" xmlns:locn="http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#" xmlns:org="http://www.w3.org/ns/org#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:prov="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:vcard="http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#" xmlns:wdrs="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.20372/nadre:1369">
    <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#Dataset"/>
    <dct:type rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text"/>
    <dct:identifier rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI">https://doi.org/10.20372/nadre:1369</dct:identifier>
    <foaf:page rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.20372/nadre:1369"/>
    <dct:creator>
      <rdf:Description>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent"/>
        <foaf:name>Engidawork Kibneh</foaf:name>
      </rdf:Description>
    </dct:creator>
    <dct:title>Level of safety culture and associated factors in X Construction Company, Ethiopia.</dct:title>
    <dct:publisher>
      <foaf:Agent>
        <foaf:name>Zenodo</foaf:name>
      </foaf:Agent>
    </dct:publisher>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#gYear">2014</dct:issued>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date">2014-06-01</dct:issued>
    <owl:sameAs rdf:resource="https://nadre.ethernet.edu.et/record/1369"/>
    <adms:identifier>
      <adms:Identifier>
        <skos:notation rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI">https://nadre.ethernet.edu.et/record/1369</skos:notation>
        <adms:schemeAgency>url</adms:schemeAgency>
      </adms:Identifier>
    </adms:identifier>
    <dct:isVersionOf rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.20372/nadre:1368"/>
    <dct:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://nadre.ethernet.edu.et/communities/uog"/>
    <dct:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://nadre.ethernet.edu.et/communities/zenodo"/>
    <dct:description>&lt;p&gt;Introduction: Construction industry has a unique nature and considered as a&lt;br&gt; dangerous industry. Due to its characteristics, the promotion of safety management&lt;br&gt; and maintaining safe work environment is difficult and inadequate. Cost of injury and&lt;br&gt; accident incurred is higher in developing country like Ethiopia. Promoting and&lt;br&gt; maintaining safety culture is a new way of decreasing workplace accidents and&lt;br&gt; creating conducive environment in construction sector.&lt;br&gt; Objective: to assess the level of safety culture and factors associated with it in X&lt;br&gt; Construction Company, Ethiopia, 2014.&lt;br&gt; Methods: An Institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted. The sample&lt;br&gt; size of the study was 422 in X construction workers with a response rate of 95%.&lt;br&gt; The data was collected by using interview administered NOSACQ-50 questionnaire&lt;br&gt; and review of records of accident report, OHS company documents and walk&lt;br&gt; through survey using workplace observation checklist to support the Questionnaire.&lt;br&gt; The score of mean above 2.5 was considered as good safety culture and below the&lt;br&gt; mean as poor safety culture; as well the level of safety culture of the company was&lt;br&gt; indicated using mean score. Both Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression&lt;br&gt; analysis were used to determine the degree of association by using odds ratio with&lt;br&gt; 95% CI. ANOVA was also used to calculate the mean differences of X construction&lt;br&gt; company sites&lt;/p&gt;</dct:description>
    <dct:accessRights rdf:resource="http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/access-right/PUBLIC"/>
    <dct:accessRights>
      <dct:RightsStatement rdf:about="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">
        <rdfs:label>Open Access</rdfs:label>
      </dct:RightsStatement>
    </dct:accessRights>
    <dcat:distribution>
      <dcat:Distribution>
        <dct:rights>
          <dct:RightsStatement rdf:about="http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by">
            <rdfs:label>Creative Commons Attribution</rdfs:label>
          </dct:RightsStatement>
        </dct:rights>
        <dcat:accessURL rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.20372/nadre:1369"/>
      </dcat:Distribution>
    </dcat:distribution>
    <dcat:distribution>
      <dcat:Distribution>
        <dcat:accessURL rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.20372/nadre:1369"/>
        <dcat:byteSize>9242237</dcat:byteSize>
        <dcat:downloadURL rdf:resource="https://nadre.ethernet.edu.et/record/1369/files/f1044446152.pdf"/>
        <dcat:mediaType>application/pdf</dcat:mediaType>
      </dcat:Distribution>
    </dcat:distribution>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>