Thesis Open Access
Dr SABIR ALEMAYEHU (General Surgery Resident)
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
<identifier identifierType="DOI">10.20372/nadre:25795</identifier>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Dr SABIR ALEMAYEHU (General Surgery Resident)</creatorName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>ASSESSMENT OF SURGICAL OUTCOME OF SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING APPENDECTOMY FOR ACUTE APPENDICITIS AT WALLAGA UNIVERSITY COMPRHENSIVE SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL, NEKEMTE, OROMIA, ETHIOPIA, A Retrospective Comparative Cross-sectional Study</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
<publicationYear>2026</publicationYear>
<dates>
<date dateType="Issued">2026-08-24</date>
</dates>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Thesis</resourceType>
<alternateIdentifiers>
<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://nadre.ethernet.edu.et/record/25795</alternateIdentifier>
</alternateIdentifiers>
<relatedIdentifiers>
<relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.20372/nadre:25794</relatedIdentifier>
<relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://nadre.ethernet.edu.et/communities/20-25</relatedIdentifier>
</relatedIdentifiers>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
</rightsList>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Abstract"><p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p>
<p><strong>Background:</strong>&nbsp;Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency and appendectomy is a standard surgical procedure. In local clinical setting, anesthetic selection for appendectomy remains clinician-driven without local evidence. Spinal anesthesia may offer advantages over general anesthesia, but comparative data are lacking.</p>
<p><strong>Objective:</strong>&nbsp;To assess surgical outcomes of spinal versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis at Wallaga University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2021-2025 G.C.</p>
<p><strong>Methods:</strong>&nbsp;This Institutional-based retrospective comparative cross-sectional study reviewed <strong>222</strong> patient records. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Bivariable logistic regression analysis done and identified candidate variables with p&lt;0.25, entered into multivariable logistic regression to determine independent predictors of surgical outcome. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% CIs were reported. Model fit and multicollinearity were assessed. Statistical significance was set at p&lt;0.05.</p>
<p><strong>Results:</strong>&nbsp;Mean age was 26.99&plusmn;9.1 years; 71.2% were male. Poor outcomes were lower with spinal vs. general anesthesia (11.7% vs. 33.3%, p=0.001), with fewer complications and shorter hospital stay (2.6&plusmn;1.4 vs. 3.8&plusmn;2.1 days, p&lt;0.001). Postoperative pain was also lower in the spinal group (p&lt;0.01). Independent predictors of poor outcome were general anesthesia (AOR 7.64), complicated appendicitis (AOR 6.98), ASA II/III (AOR 6.8), and surgery duration &gt;1 hour (AOR 10.4) (all p&lt;0.001).</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation:</strong>&nbsp;Spinal anesthesia for open appendectomy is associated with superior surgical outcomes compared to general anesthesia. These findings support to recommend Spinal anesthesia use in eligible patients within resource-limited settings.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong>&nbsp;Appendectomy, spinal anesthesia, general anesthesia, surgical outcome</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p></description>
</descriptions>
</resource>
| All versions | This version | |
|---|---|---|
| Views | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads | 0 | 0 |
| Data volume | 0 Bytes | 0 Bytes |
| Unique views | 0 | 0 |
| Unique downloads | 0 | 0 |