Thesis Open Access

Comparison of Floating Ladder Track and RHEDA2000 Ballast-less Track for Dynamic responses

Aklilu Bekele


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20240918094736.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">1575</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">4993806</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:993fc5ea8223d1824d98819983f9c7c5</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/1575/files/f1045806984.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2016-11-01</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">user-aau</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-zenodo</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:1575</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Aklilu Bekele</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Comparison of Floating Ladder Track and RHEDA2000 Ballast-less Track for Dynamic responses</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-aau</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-zenodo</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;The purpose of this thesis is concerned with the comparison of FLT and RHEDA2000 ballast-less Track-form with respect to their dynamic performances. The comparison is done based on the analysis of the simulation results and it would be achieved via FEM software (ABAQUS). The analysis have been done in time domain at various Speed of the moving Load and the mode of vibration as well as natural frequencies of both track-forms 11were extracted from frequency domain analysis&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.20372/nadre:1574</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.20372/nadre:1575</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">thesis</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
0
0
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 00
Downloads 00
Data volume 0 Bytes0 Bytes
Unique views 00
Unique downloads 00

Share

Cite as